image stats
rating
3.55
votes
728
views
16089
uploader
aDCBeast
comments
54
date added
2006-04-19
category
Sport
previous votes
Loading..
No more lying for Bush
1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
No more lying for Bush

"a man in a suit and tie"

Rate image:
[ | | ]
[ | ]
Comments for: No more lying for Bush
shaDEz Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 08:30PM

oh no! who's gonna lie for bush now? what a dilemma...
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 09:35PM

Maybe Bush will skip the middle man and just come out to the podium and lie for himself.

Damn .. he already does that.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 09:36PM

OH SHIT! The US is going to shut down!
MARINE Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 10:00PM

hahaha aDCBeast is a funny guy I have been going over his other post and I laugh my ass off.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 10:16PM

Tell it like it is Marine,and while Im at it thanks.
BigBrute Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 10:23PM

Thanks.....?????? I think the domino effect is starting, they will topple one by one. I'm still trying to figure out where those damn weapons of mass destruction are. One prez. lies about a BJ and they want to impeach him......Go figure. Keep up the post Beast, I m with ya.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 10:34PM


MARINE .. and what would you know pussy ?


BigBrute .. democrats are chomping at the bit to take back both the senate and the house.

If they take back the house, impeachment talk is going to get much more serious.

If they take back the senate, there will be a real investigation into the PR game the Bush administration used to sell the occupation of Iraq.

If they take both, Bush will have to consider resigning or be convicted.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 10:37PM

No, he's smiling because the unemployment line is short today...
MARINE Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 10:44PM

We have found a lot of weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological the resin why you don't here about it it would scare a lot of you civilians. Is that what you wanted to here, Sleep tight now.
John_Stone Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 10:47PM

The Beast is Back!!!! I can't believe it!! Trashing liberal and conservative opinion in one stroke! He's amazing! Ad Hominium attacks Galore! HE's the mostest of the mostest! Fuckin' A, dude! heeeeeee's THE BEAST!

Oh, wait, I thought this was WWF wrestling. Sorry.
MARINE Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 10:54PM

aDCBeast I think I know a lot more then you being in the military for 22 years I know stuff that even the president doesnt know about.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 11:29PM

[www.americanthinker.com]
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 11:31PM

[www.washingtonpost.com]
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 11:33PM

[www.renewamerica.us]
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 11:34PM

I hope this makes it easier on you BigPuss...I mean Brute.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 19, 2006 11:42PM

Beast still as gay and anti-american as ever.By the way I new you were a dummy-crat beast,you deny it but its true.Your not in the FBI you write for a local paper or something.Probably the National Flamer.
Anonymouuu Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 12:11AM

[www.plus613.com]
MARINE Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 12:16AM

hahaha 3154 I knew I would like you from the start.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 01:48AM

Welcome,your gonna have fun listening to Beast.He says he ex-military and FBI but his outlook really dos'nt impress me as that the right mentality to make it up the chain.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 01:49AM


MARINE .. horsehsit. the US military has not found ANY WMDs that were not accounted for by UNSCOM or IAEA.

At least know WTF the leading WMD experts like David Kay who actually searched Iraq for WMDs have said you idiot.

He said to the congress and the world "There are no WMDs unaccounted for in Iraq". "They just weren't there".

Oops. Ass.

Duane the Tard .... Still a lemming eh ?

Tard .. US military personnel around the world feel duped by President Bush. They feel they got used. Why are you lagging behind ? Did you take some shrapnel to the skull or something ?
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 01:51AM

Psssstt ... Tard ... I'm not a democrat.

you must have taken some shrapnel to the skull because you have no brain power at all.

Get another med from the nurse at the VA.
MARINE Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 01:53AM

OK aDCBeast believe whatever you wont.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 01:56AM


MARINE ... I'm sure you know how to actually perform your service unlike the president.

I sure you can clean a latrine with the best of them.

However MFer you don't know dick about anything important.

Iraq was better 1 day before the invasion than it is right now. Way and quality of life.

The same militia groups that are in a civil war right know in Iraq were fighting then except the fighting was more focused. Now that the US miltary has tried to be a policeman in Iraq the fighting has taken on more guerilla tactics. The militia groups have to injure and kill US military servicemen to attack their rival faction.

aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 02:03AM


MARINE .. then do the right thing ass. Go to the congress or write David Kay yourself with your findings.

If you are handling WMDs you are required to report your findings. Write anyone on the Senate Armed Services committee.

You won't because you are a lying piece of shit.

If WMDs had really been found the Bush admin would have splashed them all over the newspapers.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 03:16AM

I hate to admit, Beast is right on this one... if there were any WMD's there, Bush needs those to save a whole lot of face. They would be announcing it all over the place and preventing this supposed "panic" by saying "no worries though, we cleaned em all up... look how good we are".
MARINE Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 03:27AM

adbeast I agree with you on some things but not all true weapons of mass destruction are there and that is not all that we have found there. I cant discus what we have found other then WMDs I am sure you understand if you are in the federal bureau of investigation you should know this.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 04:03AM

Lemmings huh.Hey Beast drink applejuice cause OJ will kill ya.No seriously,Beast you are the one into furry critters,gerbil boy.Prove your story choad smoker.I could say you fuck your mother but sense your gay that just would'nt be true.I could say your dads finger prints are all over your ass(true!)and you have to prove me wrong.The shit you spout is funny.Tell your mom to get her false teeth filed down,these scrapes on my dick are sore.Hell one of them is almost a foot long.Who knew she could gobble the gee that far down.You know how to cut and paste dont you.Prove it.Oh yeah,fuck David Kay.We have scientists that say they were working for Sadam on WMD's on one hand and on the other we have David Kay and his crytal ball,moving at the speed of light,x-ray vision,and mental telepathy to tell us the WMD's were not there.They were buring entire fighter planes in the desert so I could not imagine the trouble to dig a hole for a 55 gallon drum.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 04:06AM

Sorry about taking so long to get back to you Beast but I was knocking out some fine pussy.You would not know about that.From your posts you can tell you wound up so tight you would have to pay for it.I guess that counts.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 04:42AM

haha haha muhahaha
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 08:37AM


Duane the Tard ... David Kay was the CIAs point man on selling the phony Iraqi scientists (really dissidents) story of mobile labs and an active WMD program in Iraq. Kay was a lackey for the Bush admin. So if you are saying Fuck David Kay then you are saying fuck the Bush admin.

You should know who you are talking about before you post a rant asshole.

I get angry when yahoos who don't know shiite about what has/is/will occur in Iraq open their fucking yappers.

Sit on the sidelines because you are not skilled enough to get in the game.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 09:55AM

You quoted him as saying they just were not there.Thats why dumbass.Your in the FBI I guess that makes you a Bush supporter.Awe did I make you angry,to bad,so sad.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 12:46PM

Beast, didn't you once claim you used to be a US Marshal?
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 01:47PM

jgoins you're back! could you accuse beast of being a nigger, spick or wetback? please just for old times sake
BigBrute Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 02:06PM

3154 Oh well. How convienient now to find chemical weapons, like we did not know they existed. They are only all over the world. And as far as being a puss, at least I post under a name not Anonymous. It is ok for us to have weapons of mass destruction, but not anyone else. Have you ever considered the idiots we have running this country. You can call people names all you want, but it does not change the fact that idiots exist. You are living proof of that. Remember the OJ Simpson case, evidence that was planted, Hello, ring any bells. Do you see how quick the case shifted to Mark Furman, Police badd ass! Same case senario here. If you can't find em' you plant em'.
Think about it.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 07:28PM


Duane the Tard (3154) .. I quoted David Kay after the Iraq Survey group which he lead cam back from Iraq and said to congress, "They just weren't there"

If you don't like the idea that these idiots believed iraqi liars that wanted the US in Iraq at all cost that is one thing. But don't try to rewrite David Kay's testimony before congress. He flat out said to the congress "Iraq did not have the WMDs we thought they did."

Oops.

jgoins ... Uh no. intelligence officer yes.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 08:32PM

Big Brute and DC Beast does anyone else here imagine two midget wrestlers.Beast you know your name is still Chickenhead to me.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 09:46PM

Well you sound just like a 20 year old I know here in Arkansas who claims he used to be a US Marshal. He lied about it too. It is easy to claim you are something your not when on the internet where nobody can check your credentials. If I am not mistaken impersinating a federal officer is illegal.

All that aside I think you will find out that Bush will finnish out his term without any impechement. The Democrats will not gain many seats in either hous or senate so the status quo will remain the same until '08.
John_Stone Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 09:51PM

[www.plus613.com]
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 20, 2006 09:58PM


jgoins .. Looks like you went to the Rush Limbaugh school of debate. If you can point out holes in someones argument you attack them with a lie. I never said I was a US Marshall and I am certainly not from a shit state like Ark. DC from birth to now.

You must not keep up with politics. Voters are pissed about the Bush admins cowboy tactics and they have voiced their opinion in various forms. Newsmedia, polls, to the Pres' face at town hall meetings. And these people are conservatives that voted for Bush twice. They are livid at out of control government spending and a military action that even the most ardent conservative has seen as a lie.

I expect the house to change and the senate to get very close. And Bush will be rendered a lame duck that will be villified in the future due to the outcome in Iraq.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: April 21, 2006 12:08PM

Polls and newscast do not show the accurate picture. When the election is over and the votes counted the true poll will be shown. I expect at that time you will be claiming the election was a fraud. I believe the voters have lost faith in the Democrate party as I have. I am a regestered Democrat and will be voting Republican this time and possibly in '08 unless the Dems get their heads out of the ass between now and then. They will have to come up with someone better than Hillary and at the same time come up with a decent platform.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 21, 2006 03:01PM


jgoins .. keep dreamin. You are not a registered democrat. another lie.

The fact is that dems don't need to say what they would do right now. W is suck an arrogant fuck that he disregards 99% of what others think. The other 1% he steals without attributing where got it from. So anyone with a plan should keep their mouth shut and let W fuck up on his own. He has proven bery good at doing that.

The republican lead congress is even worse than w.
jgoins Report This Comment
Date: April 21, 2006 10:03PM

Well I could copy and post my voter's registration card here but you would just claim it was made up with photoshop. I voted for Clinton both terms, and voted for Al Gore the first election. Then I realized we need a strong president in office so I voted Bush the second time around.

Time will tell on the '06 election. If you like polls then try looking at vote.com to see how people feel on the issues. It is no less reliable than the polls you seem to watch.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 23, 2006 08:01AM

jgoins .. what makes Bush strong ? cause his PR machine says so ? 4 1/2 yrs after 9-11 and no Bin Laden.

Actually polls are last on the list I look to. Actual people are what I listen to most. Actual people are starting to stand up to Bush and his band of crooks. The town hall meeetings with conservative only audiences are telling Bush to his face that they are afraid of government authority and that leadership is playing fast and loose with the law. Middle america thinks Bush is a crook.

Why do you think Cheney has stopped making TV interviews over the past year ? Because he is the one that sold iraqi dissident stories as fact to the american people knowing they were not true. W just went along with it because he doesn't have the balls to stand up the Cheney and his father.

Bin Laden should have been caught in 1 week in Afghanistan even if it meant losing 2000 US troops.

But as I have said. Bin Laden is living comfortably at his daddies home in Saudi Arabia.

Strength as a leader means what you say bears out in truth.

Bush says things but they never bear out in truth. That is a weak leader.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 23, 2006 05:33PM

The squeeky wheel gets the grease.People like me dont see it like that and we also rarely take time to go to town hall meetings,not to mention we dont get many in Salisbury.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 23, 2006 06:08PM


Salisbury .. many former service people are feeling betrayed (that young men and women were put needlessly in harms way in Iraq) by the Bush administration yet you cling like your life depended on it. You don't need to salute a shitty CO anymore. You're out.

There are also many non-military conservatives that are scratching their head and wondering what this clown is doing to the country. He spends more than liberals, he increases government payrolls, he appears incompetent or deceptive for invading a country with bad intel, he leaves the nation exposed financially to the Katrina disaster, he wants to give amnesty to illegal aliens, and Bin Laden still breathes. If they didn't tell you any different, you would think Bush was a democrat.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 23, 2006 07:06PM

Ijust dont see it that way.Unless the democrats come up with a clear well defined message and put forward a candidate thats not a showpiece and a flip flop,Ill vote republican again.Let the democrats come out with a clear message they will deport and search out aliens and guard the borders and you might sell it to a voter.The difference between what each would do is small,more idealism than action.Show me the country who did'nt think Sadam had WMD's.All the main intell agencies thought he had them.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 24, 2006 04:24AM


Salisbury ... the US and UK. The CIA and DIA knew Saddam had nothing. We are talking about very few operatives that would be able to gather intel on Saddam because he had a very small inner circle due to Saddam not being well liked by 80% of his countrymen.

That means 1 source provided intel for the world. 1. That cource was a known liar to the intelligence community that required independent confirmation before anything was acted on. Cheney decided to override that warning.

There is no reason to for democrats to annouce any ideas until it is too late for Bush to act on them. All Bush can do now is steal from his opponents so the dems are smart to keep their mouth shut. Plus if Bush did not like it he would sweep it under the rug anyway. It is a no gain situation for dems to announce anything.

W has flip flopped more than anyone trying to resurrect his image. Nice attempt to cover for the fool.

[www.americanprogressaction.org]

[www.cbsnews.com]

His flip flops have been noted.

Bush wants amnesty for illegal aliens for political reasons. He thinks it help Repubs in the southwest to promise amnesty to illegals. Meanwhile, midwest conservatives (ohio, indiana, illinois, iowa, etc) think Bush is rewarding illegals for their illegal behavior.

Not 1 terrorist has come across the mexican or canadian border illegally. Hell all of the highjackers on 9-11 had VISAs from the State Dept. You won't know who could commit a terrorist act until it happens.

The white boy american groups like that of Tim McViegh and Terry Nichols are evidence of that. Now that DHS is looking for every muslim to persecute they have taken their eye off white supremecist groups already in the US.

McVeighs group is still looking to do damage.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: April 24, 2006 10:53AM

Beast,may I say that was a very good argument,I dont agree on all points and some dont matter as much to me as they do others.The dems do have to gain momentum going into the next election,they have been labeled as obstructionists and unable to come up with new ideas that the public would adopt.They will have to come out and tell thier vision of the future for anyone to think anything is different.I have nothing against voting for a dem.He must have fresh ideas that make sense,be openly pro-american.He also cant appear to be owned by special intrest groups(now,naacp,unions,peta).Groups that all have a purpose but become more corrupt as membership grows and they think they have to take it to the next level.Most republicans I know would say that this would be the driving force behind thier vote.Foriegn policy is somewhat beyond the election process.I know its important but most republicans see the country as becoming morally corrupt and want a new direction for thier kids.If the dems can come up with a platform that follows these aspects they can win.
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 24, 2006 10:03PM


I expect the dem candidates to roll out a plan in Jan 08.

Until the Dubai ports deal, the immigration bill stall, and the Abramoff scandal, I would agree with you on the dems popular perception. But the perception is vastly different now.

I think the american people, most notably the people in midwest conservative states, are wondering who is running the republican party.

Crooks who take money at the expense of their constituents interests or imcompentents ? I don't think the base would vote Dem so soon but the people in the middle who really don't belong to either party will be swayed by Iraq and the declining income for middle class families.
ninepointfiver Report This Comment
Date: April 25, 2006 04:11AM

Damn, "beast", still trying to be a foreigner, we DO NOT use the term "lemming" here, commie faggot!
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: April 28, 2006 07:20AM


ninepointfiver ... what the fuck are you yammering about fag boy ?

In Washington, D.C., we use lemming to describe shit for brains like yourself.
ninepointfiver Report This Comment
Date: May 03, 2006 03:12AM

No, you all don't! I lived there for 25 years without ever hearing that slur. Maybe because I didn't hang out with Extremist, Liberal, Communists is why I never heard it!(?????)
aDCBeast Report This Comment
Date: May 05, 2006 08:01AM


ninepointfagger ... You are retarded right ?

Lemming means one who follows the crowd. You follow the crowd.

I've lived in DC all my life and lemming is in ever intelligent person's vocabulary.

Try to make yourself feel better any way you can but the fact is you are an idiot that should try harder to understand the concepts before speaking about them.

You compound your small ballz brain with the commie remark. that shiite died when the wall fell in 89. Learn a new word dumbass.
ninepointfiver Report This Comment
Date: May 06, 2006 03:24AM

Ok, fine, you're not a Communist, if you were you wouldn't be so offended. However......I'm dead serious dude; I just moved from DC in Aug. '03, and I NEVER heard that term from an American. Regardless, maybe we're from 2 different sides of the Capitol.....I'm from the North West and you're from the South East part.