Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 04:06PM
...or oil...or their president's vanity
gruff Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 04:14PM
Take your pick!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 04:17PM
Or to show that with the Republicans in charge, the USA won't roll over and
take all the shit everyone throws at us like we did with that PUSSY Clinton in
office. He was too busy getting BJs from interns to fight back when we got
ambushed in Somalia. "W" is going to prove to the world again that
you can't fuck with us and get away scott clean.
gruff Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 04:18PM
Thank God geopolitics is just like a cartoon!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 04:19PM
The USA is doing the work of Islam. Those bastards want to go visit Allah in
paradise, and we are helping to make the arrangements. We're kind of like a
travel agency.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 04:26PM
And about those polls that are taken by the MSM I dont believe in them for one
second those bastards LIE to the American people, anybody read or saw what
happened to Matt Lauer on Aug 17 when he interviewed a soldier in Iraq and got
the truth ?
[
newsbusters.org]
gruff Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 04:57PM
The revolutionary on the left looks like Jack White!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 05:18PM
you cant fight for shit..need others to show you were your going!!
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 07:21PM
Those colonists sure look like "insurgents"
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 07:22PM
Anonymous@121121
Still claiming to have the "REAL" news ? LAME !
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 07:31PM
The colonial soldiers did not set off bombs in downtown London to kill women
and children during the Revolution. They fought with the British and Hession
troops. THAT is the difference between Colonial Patriots and Iraqi insugents.
Colonial "freedom fighters" were soldiers who fought other soldiers.
Iraqi insurgents are cowards who prey primarily on the weak and defensless.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 07:43PM
Anonymous@17333
So what?
The british claimed that the guerilla fighting techiniques of the american
colonists were cowardly. But that guerilla warfare won the the US its FREEDOM
!
Take a history class asshole.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 07:49PM
True, the colonists did use guerilla techniques. On Enemy SOLDIERS. Not on
CIVILLIANS. The Colonials didn't try to defeat the British by blowing up
British civillians or their own American countrymen! You take the history class
dipshit, and get your facts straight!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 07:51PM
Are you truly so fucking ignorant that you cannot differentiate between
soldiers who attack a military target and terrorists who kill purposely kill
civillians to spread fear, chaos and panic?
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 07:55PM
The american military goes to great lengths to prevent or at least reduce
civillian casualties. The terrorists intentionally target civillians. And they
often intentionally target women and children for additional shock value! If
the US truly did not care about killing Iraqi civillians, we could have turned
their whole country into a giant parking lot with a couple well placed nukes,
instead of spending tons of money and placing our soldiers at additional risk to
try and single out military targets and limit collateral civillian damage.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:02PM
Anonymous@17333
You must not live on the east coast. The colonists targeted civilian Tories
because they were providing intelligence for the british.
Who cares if the "iraqi freedom fighters" kill civilians ? They don't
have the weapons to take the coalition on head to head so they have to do what
works. Killing civilians always works in the long run.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:04PM
So it's OK for them to do it intentionally, but wrong for us to do it even when
it is accidental? Not only are you a moron, you're a hypocrite!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:07PM
And there is a difference between going after a Tory, who is a British
sympathiser, and known to be aiding and abetting the Brits, and blowing up
random groups of civillians for no other reason than they make an easy target.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:10PM
Anonymous@17333
If you think we are not doing it intentionally then you are really naive. We
killed anything that moved.
If you think the suicide bombings don't have specific targets, like police or US
figureheads, then you haven't been looking closely enough.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:17PM
17333, please don't encourage this opinionated moron by arguing with him. He
clearly thinks he has an intellect vastly superior to ours and the only 'truth'
he will ever recognise is his own; his mind is closed to all other opinions.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:19PM
Bullshit! I have friends who are over there right now. They risk their lives
every day trying to make sure they aren't targeting the wrong people. Our
medics risk their own lives to treat the very insurgent scum we are fighting! A
medic from the unit one of my friends is in was shot by a sniper trying to
retrieve a little girl who was injured by a suicide bomber at an outdoor
MARKETPLACE crowded with civilians. Not a police station or even an area where
US troops were congregated. Our troops came from down the street AFTER the bomb
went off, and placed themselves in danger to try and help the injured Iraqis.
By the way, the soldier shot by the sniper lived because of his body armor.
Unfortunately the little girl died because of the delay in medical treatment
while they tracked down and eliminated the sniper. You have no idea what is
really going on over there you traitorous piece of shit!
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:20PM
Anonymous@20325
Well enlighten us since you know so much.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:22PM
Anon 20325: You are right. I have wasted far too much time arguing with this
moron. His ignorance knows no bounds. I refuse to waste any more time on a
pice of shit like DCBeastiality. His mind is too narrow to accept any truth
other than his own misguided beliefs.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:24PM
Anonymous@17333
The fact is you can't defend anything you say.
And the thought that Bush could have put servicemen in harms way for economic
gain scares the shit out of you.
gruff Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:44PM
aDCBeast: Blah blah blah blah!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 08:51PM
gruff
how enlightening. Did you think of that by yourself or did you have help ?
gruff Report This Comment Date: August 23, 2005 11:01PM
Blah blah blah blah!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 01:03AM
Both sides are doing what they believe is right. America is retaliating against
terrorist attacks, Iraqis are retaliating against the U.S. occupation. Is either
side 100% justified? No. Is either side 100% wrong? No.
If China invaded America, they'd be considered evil because it's our land that's
being taken. It's all a matter of perspective. Do I agree with being in Iraq?
No. Do I think we should back out? No.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 01:30AM
Anonymous@230155
that's not much of a position. In fact that is what Bush wanted all along. Once
you start you can't back out.
Plus, Bush is an ego maniac and he could never show humility by leaving Iraq
now. I think his head mind explode from the failure.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 04:42AM
I like that TRAVEL AGENCY analogy, good one, lets keep selling them tickets..
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 05:24AM
All you guys are missing the whole point of this war. There are probably a
hundred or more reasons for us being in Iraq, but the best one yet is that I
will not have to learn Arabic. Unless, of course, the liberals win.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 06:00AM
Anonymous@6029
That was stupid.
The US was never under attack. And was never in danger of being taken over by
Iraq. Iraq couldn't even take over its neighboring countries.
Saddam was best left in power because the region was stable.
But W's ego got involved and then the lying and war planning started.
duane Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 10:32AM
Blah,Blah,Blah,Blah!Blah?,Blah!!!!!!!I would keep doing it but it reminds me of
sheep and I dont want Beastiality to here you know how he loves the sheep!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 02:31PM
God fuck America.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 03:52PM
Hey bobos: pour a drink before you have a heart attack - They say hate is not
good for the heart. It must be tough hating and being miserable everyday - Oh, I
forgot thats what liberals love to do - hate, blame make excuses and drag others
down. If you do not drink - maybe a cold shower will do the trick.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 08:45PM
To Anon 25054:
God LOVES America, because we keep Hell full of scumbag terrorist souls!
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 24, 2005 10:04PM
God doesn't love America any more than any where else.
Keep sinning and see where it gets you.
gladiatrrr3000 Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 04:43AM
John 1: 39-56
And Jesus said unto Peter, "Man, do I hate these Arab fucks. Can't wait
until my favorite country, America, kills them all. That'll ensure their place
in heaven."
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 07:21AM
gladiatrrr3000
Oooo. Jesus never said 1 thing in the bible. thanks for playing. you will
receive a lovely parting gift. Tell him what he has won Johnny!
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 12:04PM
Eure geistige Armut macht mich traurig und lässt den Gedanken aufkommen, ob
das größte Waffenarsenal der Welt in Kombination mit einer Bildungsmisere
nicht den Untergang des Abendlandes bedeuten könnte.
gruff Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 01:18PM
Der Untergang des Abendlandes? Wo habe ich das schon gehoert?
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 09:06PM
We didn't attack Iraq because of Bush's ego, there are far more realpolitik
reasons for the invasion: keep a hand on the oil spigots, open up the MidEast
to capitalism, back up Israel, keep the US population under control w/ new
"antiterrorist" laws. Pretty simple really. Iraq never attacked us,
this was an unprovocated invasion of a soverign country by the US. If you don't
like that, that's too bad. Them's the facts, jack.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 09:07PM
"Evening country"... is that some cryptic reference to the Fall of
Rome or something?
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 09:35PM
Unprovocated? You must =be= Bush.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 25, 2005 10:46PM
56253:
Your intellectual poverty makes me sadly and lets arise the thought whether the
largest weapons arsenal of the world in combination with a development misery
could not mean the downfall of the evening country.
gruff:
The downfall of the evening country? Where did I already belong that?
yeah cut & paste is easy...
gruff Report This Comment Date: August 26, 2005 01:45AM
Nice job using an internet translator. Try getting a real German-English
dictionary and looking up the word Abendland, you cultureless crybabies. It's an
uncryptic reference to a book by a man named Spengler.
Also_Cocks Report This Comment Date: November 09, 2005 11:00AM
Americans are fags. Face it, you are all homosexuals fucking eachothers asses.
