Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 24, 2005 06:51AM
Wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one gets full first..It
will never happen..
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: December 24, 2005 07:17AM
Wish ? It's a certainty. The fucker broke the law in his duties as President.
Impeach the little man.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 24, 2005 11:08AM
Vote aDCBeast for Hustlers asshole of the month!
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: December 24, 2005 02:23PM
keep pulling this b.s. out of your ass, sooner or later it's bound to get to a
size 56 wide.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 24, 2005 02:51PM
Impeach Clinton and Carter.....
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: December 24, 2005 07:56PM
Clinton and Carter followed the law on wiretaps.
The New York Times has the story. They say violation of the law by the Bush
Admin bigger than what has been told.
Bush impeachment next year.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 24, 2005 09:45PM
If you think that President Bush is going to impeached your high.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: December 24, 2005 10:08PM
there you go quoting some bullshit paper again!
and yes the ny times is a on sided bullshit paper
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 24, 2005 10:58PM
He should be impeached for treason. Allowing and encouraging a foreign country
(Mexico) to invade our country is treason beyond a shadow of a doubt. This
doesn't take into account all the other laws he breaks by doing this.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: December 25, 2005 12:28AM
FOSSIL_CRAPPER
More NEOCon trash. The NYT printed the story that the Bush admin immediately
recognized as TRUE.
Now the NYT says they the number of violations of law is much greater than Bush
administration admits to.
Of course these are all official corporate and government documents so to
FOSSIL_CRAPPER they are false. Any government document is false to
FOSSIL_CRAPPER.
Anonymous@161230
What do you mean ? American's don't want to do the jobs latinos will do.
And since the US won't teach Latin nation how to be more productive, they are
being smart to come here.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 25, 2005 12:45AM
aDCBeast, if you can't see the treason then you are living in a fantasy world.
You have loyalty to Libertarian ideals and not your Country. Your a typical
Conservative type, profits over people.
pissonbeastliberals Report This Comment Date: December 25, 2005 04:47AM
Impeach bush--no way if we can let clinton off for perjury we can let bush go
to. 23840 was right wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one
gets filled first. Dont worry guys just a few more years until another
repbulican is voted in. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: December 25, 2005 10:18AM
Anonymous@161230
Are you retarded ? Look who posted the image you commented on. You don't have to
be Einstein to know I am liberal.
You also proved the written language is not your specialty.
pissonbeastliberals@23738
Clinton didn't commit perjury. 50% of the country would answer the same question
the same way. Getting a bj is not having sex.
Bush committed treasonous felonies in his officially duties as President.
If you consider getting your dick sucked a Presidential duty then I am going to
throw my name in the hat.
Americans have seen behind the curtain and now know that a moron leading this
country into the shitter.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 25, 2005 02:15PM
aDCBeast, So your response to me is that your a liberal and I'm not good at the
written language. What's that got to do with the fact that you and Bush are
traitors to your Country. You didn't refute that, you just tried to change the
subject with an attack. Allowing a foreign invasion is treason. You and Bush
have more in common than you think.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 25, 2005 03:18PM
People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, Beast. Your own grasp
of written English is tenuous, to say the least, and few of your posts make much
sense - maybe you should try reading them before clicking on "post"
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: December 25, 2005 06:48PM
Anonymous@161230
You weren't making sense so your message was incoherent. You called me a
libertarian and a typical conservative.
1) that is impossible.
2) The image above says that I'm liberal.
The images above also says I must not like Goerge Bush and his policies.
One of those policies that I disagree with is his stance on Iraq.
Dissent does not make you a traitor. The Founding Fathers would have you tarred
and feathered Tory.
Treason is trying to overthrow the government. I don't want to overthrow it. I
want to rescue it from lawbreakers.
Anonymous@8593
Dream on. Pick a good horse before you try to pile on.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: December 26, 2005 12:59AM
impeachment is an example of overthrowing a govt. in my eyes. only it will
leave Cheney in charge.
that would be fine with me, because he will get the job done alot faster and
more effectively!
only thing is his methods are alot worse to the world opinion.
who in the democratic world has any chance of being president? noone! so roll
with it and SHUT THE FUCK UP!
our founding fathers were'nt tories but do you remember the pres. lincoln post
i made?
he clearly thought dissent was being a traitor!
does that mean our 1rst pres. was a tory? NOPE!
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: December 26, 2005 03:00AM
fossil_digger
If impeachment is trying to overthrow the government then so is an election.
Cheney is going to jail. He outed the CIA agent to reporters. Scooter Libby is
covering for him like a good little assistant.
Cheney has actually the corrupter of Bush. Bush relied on Nixon crook Cheney to
make some decisions. Bush sure wishes he hadn't done that.
Anyone who doesn't break the law, especially a law their administration helped
write, can be President.
I didn't call the founding fathers tories. I said they would call anyone who
supports stifling dissent by calling it treason or unlawful would be called a
tory by the founding fathers. And they would be correct.
Lincoln was a chickenshit NAZI. Big man no ballz.
Lincoln was not the 1rst president you idiot.
Washington obviously supported dissent. He lead the revolutionary army against
King George III. President Washington would support my logic.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: December 26, 2005 04:46AM
wow i did say he was the 1rst, i was obviosly wrong there, what the hell was i
smokin, but that was the only time.
our country was founded on dissent, yeeeees.
pass and stow
either way i'm done argueing w/you theres no hope.
good luck with your crusade against republicans
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 26, 2005 06:14PM
It should say "IMPEACH aDCBeast ASS"
FUCKING LOSER..
The_truths_a_BITCH_aint_it Report This Comment Date: December 27, 2005 08:29AM
And do it fast, before America loses the last shreds of credibility in the
world for not being hopeless dumbasses.
SixSixSix Report This Comment Date: December 28, 2005 01:55AM
I'm with you aDCBeast. I think you're right on the money which,
coincidentally, forms several bread-crumb trails straight from Bush's pocket to
several lobbyists' bank accounts.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: December 30, 2005 12:17PM
"And since the US won't teach Latin nation how to be more
productive"
Yeah, we TRIED that, it didn't work because they're too damned backwards and
corrupt. It only works if you ahve a good infrastructure. Most latin countries
spent too much time bringing in new coups to do shit about fixing anything.
And no shit war is about money and goods. What other reason is there to go to
war? This later times invention about "morally correct" warfare is
pure BS. Wanna know why we got into WW2? Money. The nation was in poverty with
the depression. War is good for our economy, so the U.S. chose to involve itself
in it.
Besides, the U.S. had to go into the middle east and smack some people around.
The only thing the arabs respect is force, and it's been proven time and time
again. You let a group of people pick and peck at you long enough and before
long everyone will want a piece of you. The U.S. can't afford that. BTW, CHINA
has done more horrible acts of cruelty and moral bankruptcy than the U.S. can
even imagine, yet no major group bitches about them. Why? Because they're afraid
of China, and rightly so. The U.S. is the only power left capable of blocking
their inevitable advance. The Chinese are patient, they don't mind waiting
50-100 years for an enemy to fall, as well as helping that along.
I would say it's a good time to learn Mandarin or Cantonese, but with the way
armed illegals are crossing our border from that shithole of a country Mexico
all of the U.S. had better learn Spanish.
aDCBeast Report This Comment Date: January 02, 2006 10:38AM
Anonymous@2339
BS. The US never tried to teach latin nations anything except teach a few rebel
groups how to be terrorists.
The US's policy has always been to let american companies rape whatever country
in the region while inflaming tension between the common people and the US.
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: October 06, 2007 08:29AM
still counting........
