Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 12, 2008 01:52PM
SHIT! so that means that Germany with 19 million dead in WWI and 50 million
dead in WWII came in second ?
PW Report This Comment Date: August 12, 2008 02:21PM
drive by media fool. sensationalist. dumb hippie. all points above are wrong.
fred smith Report This Comment Date: August 12, 2008 02:25PM
#1 allowing complete morons free speech
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: August 12, 2008 03:10PM
shaDEz ol buddy, time to stop bein spoon fed 1/2 truths and lies by your new
commie buddies and start doin your own research before forwarding along such BS
party line crap which only serves to make you look uninformed/misinformed.
The points in your post are all but one, completely incorrect. While the US is
(to date) the only govt/country to have used nukes, the target was still a
militarily designated one as it struck a blow against the Japanese military
construction/support production zones in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. War is neither
sanitary nor can it be a completely civilized action (though many whiny babies
disagree), that's why it's known as war
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: August 12, 2008 03:31PM
this is some bullshit beast would pull outta his ass.
zxz555 Report This Comment Date: August 12, 2008 06:43PM
i like the pictures
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 12, 2008 10:36PM
@MrKim, I accept your statement about the original post being based on half
truths, but are you not worried about your country given that what has been
claimed is in fact half true?
@fred smith, while I know America has a proud history of democracy, is it really
no. 1 in free speech? There are other democratic countries in the world too!
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: August 12, 2008 10:59PM
Aw come on shaDEz, so now we're supposed to be impressed by half truths, or in
your summation half rights
Dude, get with the program and state complete truths or forget about postin at
all. Unless one states complete verifiable facts, EVERY further statement
becomes suspect, lessening your words impact and leaving others with doubt about
anything you say after that. \
It's kinda like givin a talk on gun safety and during the talk you manage to
shoot yourself in the foot. How much impact would your words on gun safety
hold, even if every one of them were completely true, if the audience watched
you shoot yourself?
Real simply, either get on the verifiable train of thought or stay off the rails
altogether
brokntoad Report This Comment Date: August 12, 2008 11:47PM
MrKim... Just curious as to what country you would rate as number one in each
of these catagories and where do you think the US would rate?
brokntoad Report This Comment Date: August 13, 2008 12:16AM
wow... I did a bit of research and was surprised that we would only get to
stand at the top of the podium for being war monging, jail birds that most other
people hate. We wouldnt even medal in any of the other events. DAM and I thought
we were always #1.
PS. If marijuana was legal we would lose our jail bird gold medal.
jgoins Report This Comment Date: August 13, 2008 10:44AM
Being no 1 on jailed citizens is not so bad. Did you consider that it might be
because we have one of the largest populations in the world and the other
countries who come close to us or pass us in population tend to kill their
criminals instead of putting them in jail? Maybe we should just kill criminals
right after they are convicted instead of giving them free room and board.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: August 13, 2008 05:14PM
I'm not really into speculation about such things BT, nor do I care to spend
the time sortin it all out, 'sides, stats/data and the reporting methodology in
the 1st place can be manipulated in any number of ways to arrive at whatever
destination one choose to head for, so it all becomes suspect in the end.
I think the US keeps at least fairly accurate data on a lot of things as do many
other countries while many others manipulate things to keep themselves lookin
better than things really are, yakno
I do hafta agree that without the draconian war on drugs our prison populations
would be much lower. And ... if we simply expelled the illegals within the
prison system back to their countries of origin it would likely have the same
effect while also savin good ol John Q a shitload of cash at the same time.
Sounds like a win-win if there ever was one
jgoins Report This Comment Date: August 14, 2008 11:40AM
Drug laws being what they are are is a discussion which has been going on for
years but the fact that they are illegal and people still break the laws knowing
they are illegal means they belong in jail. I would lkie pot to become legal
but because it is illegal I will not use it and haven't in over 30 years. I
still say if you do not break the laws you have nothing to fear from police.
Anonymous Report This Comment Date: August 14, 2008 11:24PM
jgoins, I do not live in the USA so I have to go by what the media reports, but
from my understanding there are a number of black people in the US who would
disagree with that last sentence of yours - ie. they had not broken any laws yet
end up in trouble with the police (either through the court system or at the end
of a baton).
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: August 15, 2008 12:30AM
you're only innocent if you're rich. public appointed lawyers are a joke.
jgoins Report This Comment Date: August 15, 2008 12:04PM
Well anon there are not as many as you would imagine.
zxz555 Report This Comment Date: August 18, 2008 11:04PM
I have changed my mind, I don't like the pictures anymore.
