anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 25, 2009 10:32AM
That is a very very young ass you sick fuck. They are gonna love your virgin
butthole in prison. Have fun with that.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: November 25, 2009 03:37PM
And you arrived at that conclusion by what fact set or reasoning?
Ooops, silly me, you censorship prone ideagogues aren't bound by the constraints
of provable, much less logical constructs .... carry on my wayward son
90130_ Report This Comment Date: November 25, 2009 11:26PM
If the person carrying this ass around is under 18, then maybe her parents
should be in prison for letting her dress like a whore in the first place.
anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 26, 2009 02:00PM
Don't insult my intelligence with that tripe kim. My 9 year old daughter grew
out of Dora the Explorer 3 years ago. My 4 & 5 year olds still loves the
show. Doubt this girl is even in middle school yet. I'd put money on it.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: November 26, 2009 02:43PM
Insult your intelligence? Sounds like canting the ABCs could suffice for that
chore.
Unless you can somehow prove out your rant, what, if any, is your point ...
short of that one at the top of your noggin
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: November 26, 2009 02:54PM
i've seen 30 years old hookers dress up like school girls for...that site my
buddies always send me links to. uh huh.
anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 26, 2009 02:56PM
yeah, take that, anonymous. cp's ok if you can't prove it's cp.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: November 26, 2009 05:26PM
I see, another one rides the (short) bus.
Let's get one thing crystal clear here :
Child
porn is NEVER OK. I neither condone it nor enjoy it .... just ain't
my bag.
The deal here and actually anywhere is .... there is no crime if there is no
evidence to substantiate that there's been one. Ergo, without some reasonable
proof she's underage your assertions are foundless and to be honest,sound
foolish. These same accusations do however state reams about things that very
likely reside inside the accuser. Any doubts about that claim? Look it up,
it's well documented in psychological journals.
Here's a good rule of thumb : Never accuse anyone of anything you can't prove.
It just might save you a lot of potential embarrassment in the long run
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: November 26, 2009 06:01PM
if you consider this pic porn or even "cp', you've been searching the
wrong sites....try
this one.
i've got to go sacrifice a turkey now, i have a funny story to tell now, check
with ya later.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 26/11/2009 06:02PM by fossil_digger.
anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 26, 2009 06:24PM
nobody's being accused of anything in a court of law. the accusation is on an
internet forum. no proof is needed. it's a clearly sexual image of someone who
is either underage or a very young-looking adult. whether she is or not underage
is immaterial in moral terms. tell yourself whatever you like though.
pulse Report This Comment Date: November 26, 2009 09:09PM
The Dora thing is hardly proof, the other day I saw a woman on the train with a
dora the explorer backpack.. she'd have been 25 years old if she was a day.
Harvey Wallbanger Report This Comment Date: November 27, 2009 12:35AM
Wow is that a fine ass or what!! That is
perfect! Who has a camera when they see that stuff? Hmmm hope it wasn't
set up... no wait, i dont care if it was!
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: November 27, 2009 03:00AM
no new anonymous factless accusations? surprise!
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: November 27, 2009 04:21AM
nobody's being accused of anything in a court of
law. the accusation is on an internet forum. no proof is needed.
I guess there's some validity to that comment, but an inherent issue with it
too. No court of law is involved though the act you describe, posting Child
Porn, is an illegal act, at least here in the states. So by claiming the chic
is underage you then would be claiming a crime has been committed. This means
to substantiate your claim you must then supply proof, which my guess says you
straight up can't do.
I could "claim" to be Howard Hughs long lost heir and deserving of a
large share of the Hughs fortune on this same internet forum but without
offering something to prove out that claim it holds no water and like your own
claim, it pretty much means nothing.
it's a clearly sexual image of someone who is either
underage or a very young-looking adult. whether she is or not underage is
immaterial in moral terms.
Ah yes, that whole I'm moral but you're not "'cause I say so" thing.
Now we seem to be getting to the meat of the matter!
So it seems your morality issue with this pic seems to revolve around the idea
that because she looks young the image is then immoral. Let me clue you in on
something that's been going on in the art world for centuries. Young models are
now and always have been more highly sought after than older ones. The simple
why has no relation to morality at all, it's just that younger models are more
attractive and hence make more appealing subjects.
If that's too much for you to handle I would have to suggest you get yourself
some oversized blinders and wear 'em daily so you don't wind up having to berate
yourself on a daily basis for what you might see without them to protect
you.
You moralists sure are a funny bunch. I don't guess I'll ever understand others
thinkin they know best for anyone but themselves, much less expecting they have
some real right to make such judgements in relation to others
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: November 27, 2009 04:27AM
90130 sent this to me today, i thought i'd share:
If a conservative doesn’t like guns, he doesn’t buy one.
If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.
If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn’t eat meat.
If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for
everyone.
If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat his
enemy.
A liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look good.
If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.
If a black man or Hispanic is conservative, they see themselves as independently
successful.
Their liberal counterparts see themselves as victims in need of government
protection.
If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his
situation.
A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.
If a conservative doesn’t like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don’t like be shut down.
If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn’t go to church.
A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced. (Unless
it’s a foreign religion, of course!).
If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it,
or may choose a job that provides it.
A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.
If a conservative slips and falls in a store, he gets up, laughs and is
embarrassed.
If a liberal slips and falls, he grabs his neck, moans like he's in labor and
then sues.
If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good
laugh.
A liberal will delete it because he's "offended.”
90130_ Report This Comment Date: November 27, 2009 07:13AM
Glad you liked it. I did.
pro_junior Report This Comment Date: November 27, 2009 04:25PM
If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a
good laugh.
A liberal will delete it because he's "offended.”
I'll do neither...what does that mean?
anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 27, 2009 04:55PM
A liberal will delete it because he's "offended.”
That's because if liberals had their way it would be legal to walk the streets
naked, including children, just so they could have a look-see. I'm not even
going to address kim's comments. He's so fuckin retarded with tunnel vision it's
not even funny.
FrostedApe Report This Comment Date: November 28, 2009 08:56AM
Anyone who can't even be bothered to think up a fake user name isn't going to
"waste" enough brain-power to come up with a post that's worth
reading.
anonymous Report This Comment Date: November 28, 2009 01:45PM
What about the guy that uploaded the pic apeshit? he posted anonymously
because. he knows she's 12 or under. have to have an IQ of 40 to not see she's
that young.
Onyma Report This Comment Date: November 28, 2009 04:05PM
Just going to add a bit to this thread...
A. if you do a TinEye related image search on the web you'll discover quite
quickly that this is a Photoshop... one version of the original image here:
[
play.kapook.com]
B. Someone photoshopped it to look younger and fuller than it was
originally.
C. Probably the same someone added the cartoon logo to imply a young age.
D. The final image made it's way around the internet and a copy found it's way
here.
So it would appear that: No parent let their child dress like that (at least
not for this photo)... the odds of it actually being a child are slimmer when
you look at the original... the photo does appear to have been doctored with the
intent to imply someone underaged... and the sicko in this entire process is the
one who doctored the photo in the first place.
That is all. Carry on.
Mrkim Report This Comment Date: November 28, 2009 04:11PM
Yep, this is usually what happens when you start feedin the anonychimps. Soon
as their bellies get full they start slingin turds all around the place.
If your IQ is above 40 I'd be truly amazed. My own resides in a number just
below a factor of 4 and it tells me while the pic is surely displayin a nicely
rounded and shapely bottom it also tels me there isn't enough data to adequately
determine the absolute age of the ass in question. I will say this though, if
you think only a 12 yr old can posess an ass that fine I'd hate to see the slab
of feemale you settled for. Mskim #2 had an ass that nice and she was 39 when I
met her!
Talk about tunnel vision? If I were handin out prizes to mentally challenged,
self righteous, self obsessed blow hards ... you'd be 1st in the receiving
line.
Now then .... Go get your shine box
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: November 28, 2009 04:41PM
i must admit to google'n "Dora the explorer hotpants". you bastards
are responsible for one of the freakiest results in my net lifetime.
Onyma Report This Comment Date: November 28, 2009 05:06PM
Fess up Fossil, you know you bookmarked it
fossil_digger Report This Comment Date: November 29, 2009 06:26AM
i decided soon after executing the search to escape out asap in fear of the
"cp" pigs.
