image stats
rating
2.76
votes
46
views
877
uploader
woberto
comments
5
date added
2023-07-20
category
Sport
previous votes
Loading..

Bomb them back to the stone age

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
Bomb them back to the stone age

"a group of people standing on a roof"

Comments for: Bomb them back to the stone age
woberto Report This Comment
Date: July 20, 2023 08:24AM

Oh wait, they already are in the stone age.
Sweden, if it had balls instead of immigrints,
should launch one missile into that shit hole every 5 minutes...
...until an actual government is formed that wants to be part of the rest of the world.
And if that doesn't happen, just keep bombing the cunts until there is nothing left.
Anon Report This Comment
Date: July 20, 2023 09:05AM

"Until an actual government is formed that wants to be part of the rest of the world. " That's what they had. The yanks, believing in Manifest Destiny, a lie they made up (that it's God's Manifest Destiny that the "White American Race" own all trade, assets, resources and money in the whole world. That is, the world. Destabilised the Middle East.

By all accounts, Iraq was a good place to live once. If you could speak the language. Not just during the British Empire but for a few years afterwards.

Why did Britain and so on take part in the illegal invasion of Iraq? For the same reason they condemn Russia doing the same thing in Ukraine: corrupt politicians who invested in Basic Industries Group. To prevent the yanks seizing their accounts without pay (the investments are not declared and the operations illegal) they obey the yanks. And there had been no large, low cost oil finds since 2000, except in Iraq. Plus juicy contracts and higher interest paid on government debt during war. Whilst the Arabs look with glee at the defeat of the yanks in the Middle East, the people who actually started the war had won before the first shot was fired. If anyone, China, Russia, so on, could get hold of the Basic Industries Group investor list, it would make an awesome kill list. It would completely stabilise the world - no yanks sailing a fleet up the Chinese coast, saying "We can do what we want.", so no triggering the Maoist doctrine that "The best form of defense is attack.", so no nine dotted line, no coming war on Taiwan. Just for starters.
Peter Puller Report This Comment
Date: July 21, 2023 08:44PM

> by all accounts, Iraq was a good place to live

I am told the same is true for Iran. Thing is, in both countries, people who did not represent the beautiful, peaceful citizens forced out the benevolent leaders and got themselves into office.

And that's one reason cited why the West and the Middle East have been at odds for recent memory. Yes, not questioning there's a bit of the evil of capitalism involved nowadays, but because the people in charge Now are less friendly to others and their own people than they were Then.
woberto Report This Comment
Date: July 22, 2023 04:41AM

Majority of middle eastern "citizens" prefer a monarch or a supreme leader.
Anon Report This Comment
Date: July 25, 2023 08:50AM

Told the same thing for Iran. So was I, by someone who spent months in prison for protesting. He was a monarchist who skipped the border. I asked another Iranian who was surprised there were still Iranian monarchists - but he was allowed out of the country. And that's all you need to know about modern Iran: the control of 'truth'.