image stats
rating
2.92
votes
201
views
5556
uploader
Anonymous
comments
18
date added
2005-10-09
category
Sport
previous votes
Loading..
log in
Username:

Password


indent register
indent recover

US SOCCER

1 star2 stars3 stars4 stars5 stars
US SOCCER

Comments for: US SOCCER
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: October 09, 2005 01:37AM

MEXICO SUCKS
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: October 09, 2005 03:03AM

CONCACAF Group
...................G W D L GF GA D PTS

1.México*..........9 7 1 1 21 7 14 22

2.Estados Unidos*..9 6 1 2 14 6 8 19

3.Costa Rica*......9 5 1 3 14 11 3 16

4.T. y Tobago......9 3 1 5 8 14 -6 10

5.Guatemala........9 2 2 5 13 17 -4 8

6.Panamá...........9 0 2 7 4 19 -15 2
-------------------------------------
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: October 09, 2005 03:05AM

FIFA World Ranking
--------------
1 Brazil
2 Netherlands
3 Argentina
4 Czech Republic
5 Mexico
6 France
7 USA
8 Spain
9 Portugal
10 Sweden
--------------------
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: October 09, 2005 10:52AM

soccer still sucks
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: October 09, 2005 08:52PM

Mexican soccer sucks, as does the entire fucking country of Mexico.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: October 09, 2005 11:25PM

As does the United Sucky States of America.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: October 10, 2005 03:44AM

nuh uhnt uh infinity! lol, i win!
mkcerusky Report This Comment
Date: October 10, 2005 08:57AM

1. no way to compare USA and Mexico in soccer: Mexico is defenetly superior, even if USA this time beaten them
2. FIFA World Ranking is completely random and generally not based on the results, otherwise how comes that France is put higher then Italy and England when France didn't even qualify for the World Cup whilst Italy and England did?
3. Why Ukraina that was the first european team to qualify (with a plaier like Shevchenko!!!) comes after Spain (?!), Sweden (?!!!) and Netherelands (?!?!?). Netherlands in particular has not een winning anything recently, why should they be on top of the list?
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: October 10, 2005 09:34PM

its because when you play against better teams the fifa give you more points in the ranking, and because France won the world cup in 98, each group have different teams, that if you beat them it give you different kinds of points because its not the same beating Brazil(#1) than beating American Samoa(#205)... also in the ranking they count all kinds of cups, like the Euro, Confederation, Gold Cup, etc.
Anonymous Report This Comment
Date: October 10, 2005 11:49PM

Never the less, Mexico still sucks, the thugs they call footballers, and the entire toilet of a country.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: October 11, 2005 05:20AM

you must not have been to the same mexico as me! mexico is beautiful! but just like any country it has it's "toilets"
mkcerusky Report This Comment
Date: October 11, 2005 08:19AM

France won the world cup in 98? So? it was 7 years ago! For the same reason then Boris Becker should be in the top ten of tennis players, while he is not!
If it was the Euro cup to count then France could never be before Greece who won it.
I think the FIFA classification is just a shit based probably on sponsors or other economical reasons.

More over, who did Argentina and Brazil beat? Soth american teams? Do we want to compare south american teams with european teams? It is not by chance if usually in the world cups the first 8 classified teams are mainly european, apart from brazil and argentina.
mkcerusky Report This Comment
Date: October 11, 2005 08:21AM

Ah, and I just noticed that Spain is in 8th position, and they never won one single thing....how can you trust this ranking? tsk!
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: October 11, 2005 01:47PM

fifa rankings are nothing more than anticipation builders for upcoming games. trying to create more interest in a game than there really is. just like our own college football rankings. they are never accurate just building more interest. texas being ranked so high perfect example. they have no business being in the to 20! but they know the intense interest in texas for football. texas tech is another perfect example. spain being high is a good one also cause the interest in spain has been dropping off, so whats the answer? rank 'em so their fans become more interested and they will come in droves to see their boys play anyone. correct me if you think i'm wrong.
mkcerusky Report This Comment
Date: October 12, 2005 12:12PM

good point fossil_digger ....and considered that in Italy the interest on soccer will never drop down, then it is explained why we are always ranked so low. This explains also why the ranking of USA is so high.
fossil_digger Report This Comment
Date: October 20, 2005 03:33AM

bingo
mkcerusky Report This Comment
Date: November 14, 2005 11:27AM

Two days ago, on the 9th of November 2005, the so incredibly good Netherlands team was beaten at home 3-1 by Italy: another proof that this ranking is simply ridicolous!
mkcerusky Report This Comment
Date: November 25, 2005 02:27PM

In the latest ranking italy is stll 12 ...and netherlands (who we just beaten at their home) is still up there, tsk!